THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS IN RESOLVING CORPORATE DISPUTES IN GERMANY, THE UNITED STATES AND UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Ramazon Dilshod o‘g‘li Nasriddinov Master student of Tashkent State University of Law

Keywords:

alternative dispute resolution (ADR), mediation, arbitration, corporate disputes, Germany, United States, Uzbekistan, legal frameworks, litigation costs, business relationships, cultural contexts, fast dispute resolution.

Abstract

This article discusses the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods in resolving corporate disputes in three countries: Germany, the United States, and Uzbekistan. ADR methods such as mediation and arbitration are compared and contrasted across the three countries, with an emphasis on their prevalence, efficacy, and legal frameworks. The article highlights the importance of ADR methods in reducing litigation costs, preserving business relationships, and ensuring faster dispute resolution. The article also provides insights into the unique cultural and legal contexts of each country and their impact on the use of ADR methods in resolving corporate disputes. Overall, the article provides a comprehensive analysis of the use of ADR methods in resolving corporate disputes in Germany, the United States, and Uzbekistan.

References

American Bar Association. (2021). Alternative Dispute Resolution. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/dispute_resolution/resources/

Deinert, O. (2012). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Germany. International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, 1(1), 5-16.

Khakberdiev AA ARBITRATION COURT: SOME ISSUES OF LAW PROTECTION //World Bulletin of Management and Law. - 2021. - T. 4. - S. 9-12.

Kluwer Law International. (2020). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Germany: Overview. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-622-1564?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true

KHAKBERDIEV A. HISTORY AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL //International Journal of Early Childhood. - 2022. - T. 14. - no . 02. – S. 2080-2090.

Štefánik L., Khakberdiev A., Davronov D. CLASSIFICATION AND TYPES OF ARBITRATION COURTS // Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. - 2022. - no . 79-2. - S. 19-25.

Lipsky, D., & Seeber, R. (2006). Using ADR to Build Relationships: Theory and Practice. Dispute Resolution Journal, 61(3), 24-33.

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2000). Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving. Negotiation Journal, 16(3), 217-233.

А.А.Хакбердиев Низоларни муқобил тартибда ҳал қилишда ҳакамлик ва арбитраж судининг ўрни ва уларнинг турлари // Журнал правовых исследований. - 2022. - 7-jild. - 4.

Peters, C., & Johnson, J. (2016). The Development of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States: An Overview. International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, 4(1), 45-57.

Abdumurad K. Ensuring Confidentiality in the Detection and Investigation of the Crimes of Money Laundering // Rechtsidee . - 2019. - T. 5. – no. 2. - S. 10.21070/ jihr . 2019.5. 65-10.21070/ letter . 2019.5. 65.

Khakberdiev A. THE PROCESS OF TERMINATION OF AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT WITH AN EMPLOYEE OF A FOREIGN EMBASSY //Science and innovation. - 2022. - T. 1. – no. C7. - S. _ 303-306.

Hakberdiev AA CHALLENGES OF ARBITRATION IN REFORMING CIVIL AND ECONOMIC PROCEDURAL PROCESSES //Archive of Conferences. - 2021. - S. 159-162.

Resnik, J. (2000). Managerial Judges. Harvard Law Review, 113(3), 730-826.

Khakberdiev AA PROSPECTS OF IMPROVING ARBITRATION COURTS AS ONE OF THE METHODS OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN UZBEKISTAN //Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal. - 2023. - T. 4. – no. 1. - S. 77-88.

Yu P., Khakberdiev A. ABOUT PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES CONDUCTING AN INTERROGATION //Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. - 2021. - no. 60-3. - S. 6-9.

Sternlight, J. (2003). Using Arbitration to Eliminate Employment Discrimination Claims: The Promise and the Reality. Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal, 20(1), 1-46.

“Alternative Dispute Resolution” Findlaw. https://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/alternative-dispute-resolution-adr.html

Khakberdiev AA WAYS OF IMPROVING ARBITRATION COURTS IN UZBEKISTAN //INTELLECTUAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND INNOVATIVE DIGITAL TOOLS. - 2023. - T. 2. – no. 14. - S. 75-81.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

Nasriddinov , R. D. o‘g‘li. (2023). THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS IN RESOLVING CORPORATE DISPUTES IN GERMANY, THE UNITED STATES AND UZBEKISTAN. Educational Research in Universal Sciences, 2(2 SPECIAL), 41–49. Retrieved from http://erus.uz/index.php/er/article/view/1956