FEATURES OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS OF DNA EXAMINATION RESEARCH
Keywords:
DNA examination research, false positives, false negatives, sample collection, mixed DNA profiles, statistical methods, population genetics, match probabilities, DNA analysis techniques, reference databases, forensic science, legal interpretationAbstract
The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the limitations of DNA analysis, including the possibility of false positives and false negatives, as well as the potential for errors in sample collection and analysis. It also highlights the need for caution when interpreting mixed DNA profiles, which can be particularly challenging to analyze and may require advanced statistical methods. The article discusses various factors that can affect the interpretation of DNA evidence, including the quality and quantity of the DNA sample, the presence of DNA from multiple contributors, and the use of different DNA analysis techniques. It also explores the impact of population genetics on the interpretation of DNA evidence, including the importance of using appropriate reference databases to calculate match probabilities.
References
Butler, J. M. (2015). Forensic DNA typing: Biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Academic Press.
Gill, P., &Werrett, D. J. (2015). Interpretation of DNA evidence. Wiley.
Coble, M. D., & Butler, J. M. (2005). Characterization of new miniSTR loci to aid analysis of degraded DNA. Journal of forensic sciences, 50(1), 43-53.
National Research Council. (2010). The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence. National Academies Press.
Budowle, B., Moretti, T. R., &Baumstark, A. L. (1999). Defining the limits of forensic mitochondrial DNA testing. Forensic Science Review, 11(1/2), 1-21.
Butler, J. M. (2012). Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(2), 327-335.
