SUN’IY INTELLEKT VA INTELLEKTUAL MULK HUQUQINING O‘ZARO NISBATI
Keywords:
sun’iy intellekt, intellectual mulk huquqi, mualliflik huquqi, ixtiroga bo‘lgan huquq, muallif, huquq egasi.Abstract
O‘tgan asr texnologiya, ilm-fandagi va sun’iy intellekting yaratilishi kabi misli ko‘rilmagan kashfiyotlar bilan alohida xarakterga ega. Yaqin yillar tajribasi shuni ko‘rsatadiki, sun’iy intellekt jamiyki internet tarmog‘ida mavjud bo‘lgan ma’lumotlar va ko‘rsatmalar asosida o‘zi mustaqil tarzda ixtirolar qilmoqda, asarlar yozmoqda, hatto tasviriy san’at asarlarini yaratmoqda. Basharti, intellektual mulk huquqi birovning intellektual natijalarini (mehnati) uning roziligisiz yoki ruxsatisiz boshqasi tomonidan foydalanilmasligini yoki tijoratlashtirmasligini kafolatlaydi. Biroq, sun’iy intellekt inson emasligi va aslida insonning g‘oyasi bo‘lganligi sababli, intellectual mulk huquqi va sun’iy intellekt sohasidagi bahs tobora kuchayib bormoqda. Dunyo hamjamiyati bahs-munozaralariga ko‘ra, sun’iy intellekt o‘z asarlari va ixtirolariga mualliflik yoki ixtirochilik huquqlarini olishi mumkinmi degan savol tug‘ilmoqda. Maqola sun’iy intellekt tomonidan yaratilgan intellectual mulk huquqi obyektlarining huquqiy maqomini, qonunchilik va amalyotda yuzaga kelishi mumkin bo‘lgan tafovutni hamda ulardan foydalanish natijasida olinadigan foydalar haqida so‘z yuritadi. Xulosada sun’iy intellekt haqidagi qoidalarni yaratish yuzasidan tavsiyalar beriladi.
References
Бозоров С. Sun’iy intellekt javobgarligining axloqiy va huquqiy taomillari //Общество и инновации. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 3. – С. 48-56.
Jeremy Cubert and Richard Bone, ‘The law of intellectual property created by artificial intelligence’, in Barfield
and Pagallo (n 3) 415.
WIPO, ‘WIPO Technology Trends 2019: Artificial Intelligence’ (Geneva 2019) 13.
Anke Moerland and Conrado Freitas, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Trademark Assessment’ in Jyh-An Lee, Reto Hilty, and Kung-Chung Liu, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property (OUP 2021); WIPO, ‘WIPO Index of AI initiatives in IP offices’ (2021) www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/artificial_intelligence/search.jsp accessed 23/02/2022.
Artificial Intelligence, ENG. OXFORD LIVING DICTIONARIES, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/artificial_intelligence [https://perma.cc/WF9V-YM7C] (last
visited Feb. 27, 2019); see STUART J. RUSSELL & PETER NORVIG, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A
MODERN APPROACH 1 (3rd ed. 2010).
Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, et al. Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum. JAMA Intern Med. Published online April 28, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838
Бозоров С. Sun’iy intellekt javobgarligining axloqiy va huquqiy taomillari //Общество и инновации. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 3. – С. 48-56.
Arkhipov, V., Naumov, V. – P. 164.
Winkler A. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights. Liverlight, 2018. See a description here: Ошибка! Недопустимыйобъектгиперссылки.
Drexl (n 17) 4. https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-8-4-2017/4636/JIPITEC_8_4_2017_257_Drexl
https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html
The first pop song ever written by artificial intelligence is pretty good, actually. https://qz.com/790523/daddys-car-the-first-song-ever-written-by-artificial-intelligence-is-actually-pretty-good
Julia Gregory, Press Association Wins Google Grant to Run News Service Written by Computers (6 July. 2017) available at accessed 3rd October, 2021.
Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 21.04.2021-y., 03/21/683/0375-son, 21.08.2021-y., 03/21/709/0808-son https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-1022944
copyright law. https://dejure.org/gesetze/UrhG/8.html
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/340/#344
Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 16 (2 March 2012). http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2012/16.html
UK copyright law, section 9(3) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/9
Patents, WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION, http:// www.wipo.int/patents/en/
Patent Protection – UNHinnovation, UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, http://innovation.unh.edu/patent-protection.
“Ixtirolar, foydali modellar va sanoat namunalari to‘g‘risida”gi qonun 5-moddasi, https://lex.uz/docs/-76671
Liza Vertinsky & Todd M. Rice, Thinking about Thinking Machines: Implications for Machine Inventors For Patent Law, B. U. J SCI. & TECH L. 82 (2002), http://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/ scitech/ volume82/ vertinsky&rice.pdf.
Consolidated Patent Laws, § 100 (f), U.S.C 35, https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/consolidated_laws.pdf.
Angela Chena. Can an AI be an inventor? Not yet. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/01/08/102298/ai-inventor-patent-dabus-intellectual-property-uk-european-patent-office-law/
Asid MOHAMAD, individually and for the Estate of Azzam Rahim, Deceased, et al., Petitioners
v. PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY et al. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8123691441658588112
UK Court of Appeal says AI is not an Inventor & is split on allowing applications for AI inventions, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/uk-court-of-appeal-says-ai-is-not-an-8415189/
AI cannot be named as inventor on patent applications: written decision now available, https://www.epo.org/news-events/news/2022/20220706.html
DABUS Gets Its First Patent in South Africa Under Formalities Examination. https://ipwatchdog.com/2021/07/29/dabus-gets-first-patent-south-africa-formalities-examination/id=136116/
Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent, https://patentlyo.com/patent/2021/08/traction-recognize-invented.html
Ryan Abbot, I think, therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law, 57 B.C.L. Rev. 1079, 1095 (2016).
Swapnil Tripathi and Chandni Ghatak. Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law, https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.12.5
Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 03/22/757/0181-son. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-24925
WIPO, Trademarks, https://www.wipo.int/trademarks/en/
Dev S. Gangjee, Eye, Robot: Artificial Intelligence and Trademark Registers (24 July 2020) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?ABSTRACT_id=3467627
Alexander Butterman and others, Use of Artificial Intelligence by IP Registries (October 2019) <https://www.inta.org/wp-content/uploads/public-files/advocacy/committee-reports/AI-Use-by-IP-Registries-Report_-10.18.2019.pdf >
L’Oréal SA v. eBay International AG. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/loreal-sa-v-ebay-international-ag/
Artificial Intelligence Poses a Greater Risk to IP than Humans to, TECHCRUNCH(Dec. 31, 2015), https:// techcrunch.com/ 2015/ 12/31/artificial-intelligence-poses-a-greater-risk-to-ip-than-humans-do/.
