THE IMPORTANCE AND VARIOUS TYPES OF ASSESSMENT IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING
Keywords:
evaluation, formative, summative, teaching methods, curriculum map, grading, feedback, pedagogical techniques.Abstract
This article explores modern techniques and different ways of assessing students’ performance during the teaching process. It discusses the difference of formative and summative assessment, their results, and their implications for learners. The aim is to provide educators with effective strategies to evaluate and grade students.
References
Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2004). Assessment for effective teaching: Using context-adaptive planning. Boston, MA: Pearson A&B.
Just Science Now! (n.d.). Assessment-inquiry connection. https://www.justsciencenow.com/assessment/index.htm
Nicol, D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006) Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31(2): 2-19.
Theall, M. and Franklin J.L. (2010). Assessing Teaching Practices and Effectiveness for Formative Purposes. In: A Guide to Faculty Development. KJ Gillespie and DL Robertson (Eds). Jossey Bass: San Francisco, CA.
Trumbull, E., & Lash, A. (2013). Understanding formative assessment: Insights from learning theory and measurement theory. San Francisco: WestEd.
O‘Hare, M. (2013, September 23). Peer evaluation of class participation. Retrieved from https://teaching.berkeley.edu/blog/peer-evaluation-class-participation opens in new window
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5), 535-550
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
